Friday, August 15, 2014

The Fisher King (1991)

Director: Terry Gilliam
Writer:    Richard LaGravenese
Cast:       Jeff Bridges, Robin Williams, Mercedes Ruehl, Amanda Plummer

A modern day tale about the search for love, sanity, Ethel Merman and the holy grail.

Jeff Bridges plays the role of a radio DJ, Jack,  who inadvertently prompts someone to carry out a massacre in a New York bar. His career goes downhill and is staying now with his girlfriend who owns a video store. He meets a mad homeless man (Robin Williams) whose wife was murdered in that massacre and is now in search for holy grail. What follows is a story of redemption as they help each other in finding happiness which is their holy grail. The title refers to the Arthurian legend, the Fisher King, who is the latest in a long line charged with keeping the Holy Grail. The film's version of the legend is as follows:

Parry: It begins with the king as a boy, having to spend the night alone in the forest to prove his courage so he can become king. Now while he is spending the night alone he's visited by a sacred vision. Out of the fire appears the holy grail, symbol of God's divine grace. And a voice said to the boy, "You shall be keeper of the grail so that it may heal the hearts of men." But the boy was blinded by greater visions of a life filled with power and glory and beauty. And in this state of radical amazement he felt for a brief moment not like a boy, but invincible, like God, so he reached into the fire to take the grail, and the grail vanished, leaving him with his hand in the fire to be terribly wounded. Now as this boy grew older, his wound grew deeper. Until one day, life for him lost its reason. He had no faith in any man, not even himself. He couldn't love or feel loved. He was sick with experience. He began to die. One day a fool wandered into the castle and found the king alone. And being a fool, he was simple minded, he didn't see a king. He only saw a man alone and in pain. And he asked the king, "What ails you friend?" The king replied, "I'm thirsty. I need some water to cool my throat". So the fool took a cup from beside his bed, filled it with water and handed it to the king. As the king began to drink, he realized his wound was healed. He looked in his hands and there was the holy grail, that which he sought all of his life. And he turned to the fool and said with amazement, "How can you find that which my brightest and bravest could not?" And the fool replied, "I don't know. I only knew that you were thirsty.

The film if you go just by plot is very melodramatic but when put in a Gilliam universe it is something else. The scenes involving the red knight stands out. It has got a feel good ending which you don't expect from a Gilliam film and it is much more of a mainstream film by his standards. The performances by all the four main characters are excellent. Jeff Bridges is certainly very underrated and underused but he still managed to get an academy award with 'Crazy Heart'. Robin Williams is in a typical role of his but in a much more substantial film than his usual children's films. Still my favorite performance of his is the against the type professor in 'Good Will Hunting' for which he received his Oscar. Jumanji was also a favorite film of mine during my childhood even though I was kind of half terrified by it.

Rating: 4/5

Thursday, August 14, 2014

The Outsiders (1983)

Director: Francis Ford Coppola
Writers:  Kathleen Rowell, S.E. Hinton
Cast:       C. Thomas Howell, Matt Dillon, Ralph Macchio, Tom Cruise

A town is split between the wealthy South Zone gang called 'The Socials' and the poor North Zone gang called 'The Greasers'. When two poor greasers are attacked by the socs, one of them kills ones of the attackers setting out the chain of events depicted in the film.

This was Coppola's second film after the big budget 'Apocalypse Now' which made him almost bankrupt. It was made back to back with 'Rumble Fish' which also featured many of the actors and was shot in the same locations. It is an odd little film with a very different atmosphere to it. It is not gritty as one would think considering the background of its characters but that might be due to the fact that the main two characters that we follow are teenagers. Essential message of the film is for the Ponyboy kid to Stay Gold and move up the social classes by pursuing his studies. In some sense these two teenagers are much more mature than their older gang members. Stevie Wonder did the 'Stay Gold' song and much of the soundtrack consists of Elvis Presley tracks. 'Out of Limits' by 'The Marketts' is used in an important scene and I had a dejavu moment when it came up being very familiar with it form 'Pulp Fiction'. That scene with blood spreading all over the screen would remind you of the Grindhouse also. 

In places like India where people take religion, caste etc to divide and gang up, in developed world the social class is the differentiator. With so much talk about gentrification and inequality in recent times, the film might find resonance for many. It is not a perfect film but is among the better ones I have seen dealing with teenage angst. Haven't seen 'Rebel without a cause' mind.

Rating: 3.5/5

 

A Time to Kill (1996)

Director: Joel Schumacher
Writers:  John  Grisham, Akiva Goldsman
Cast:       Matthew McConaughey, Samuel L. Jackson, Sandra Bullock, Kevin Spacey

A young lawyer defends a black man accused of murdering two men who raped his 10-year-old daughter, sparking a rebirth of KKK. 

Film is an adaptation of John Grisham's novel by the same name and it is one of the better adaptations of his novels to the screen. Apart from this I have seen 'The Rainmaker', 'The Pelican Brief' and 'The Firm' and not surprisingly Rainmaker is the best directed one out of these which is not surprising since it is a Coppola film. The only novel out of these that I have read is 'The Firm' which I think was recommended to me by my good friend Kieve (or was it 'Silence of the Lambs'). 

The film is around two and hours long and I didn't mind its length since it is not just concentrating purely on the court trial. Joel Schumacher is not a grade A director and you are not expecting a cinematic masterpiece from him but what you get is a solid enough film which is a good one-time watch. Film was a commercial success and it got some criticisms due to what some people would perceive as glorification of vigilantism. I don't understand these glorifying accusations that people make against films in general. I can understand it when people are talking about children's films but as an adult you are supposed to be able to form opinions and the films just need to make you think about all these dilemmas if at all it is supposed to make you think. What it made me think about is the American jury system with which I have always been uncomfortable with. Is it better to rely on a judge like we do in India and hope that the institution don't get corrupted or have s system like in US where you rely on a citizen jury knowing that everyone is prone to biases and many irrational things cloud our judgement.

'A Time to Kill' and 'Dazed & Confused' are cited as McConaughey's better works before he hit his McConaissance. He is playing another one of his stereotypical heavily accented man from redneck part of America. But I have to say his best performance in a lawyer role would be in Richard Linklater's 'Bernie'.

Rating: 3.5/5

Tuesday, August 12, 2014

Seven Psychopaths (2012)

Director: Martin McDonagh
Writer:    Martin McDonagh
Cast:       Colin Farrell, Sam Rockwell, Christopher Walken, Woody Harrelson

A struggling screenwriter inadvertently becomes entangled in the Los Angeles criminal underworld after his oddball friends kidnap a gangster's beloved Shih Tzu.

This was my second watch of the film after having been slightly disappointed when I saw it for the first time with a mindset to compare it with Martin McDonagh's debut feature, 'In Bruges'. Film is an unhinging mess leaving you wondering many times 'What the Shih Tzu??'. The screenwriter played by Colin Farrell is named Martin, which is a nod to the writer/director himself and he is writing a script for a film titled 'Seven Psychopaths'. There are characters talking about the story within the film things like how the final stand-off scene will be and how the animals don't get hurt and so on. Sam Rockwell is as annoying to us as he is to his friends and I think it is intentional. 

It is not as good as 'In Bruges' and I don't think Martin McDonagh is too comfortable with the American setting of the film. It has plenty of good sequences especially relating to the different psychopaths in the fictional story within the story but I don't think the film as a whole is as good as the sum of its parts. I have the same feeling as when I saw it for the first time, it is more than good but not great. It is kind of an inferior version of 'Kiss Kiss Bang Bang'. Mickey Rourke was supposed to play the Woody Harrelson character initially but dropped out due to differences with McDonagh. I think it could have been better with Mickey Rourke if he were to bring some more menace into the character like Ralph Fiennes did in 'In Bruges'. Then again people would have accused McDonagh of repeating the same character.

Rating: 3.5/5

Sunday, August 10, 2014

Short Cuts (1993)

Director: Robert Altman
Writers:  Robert Altman, Raymond Carver, Frank Barhydt
Cast:      Andie McDowell, Julianne Moore, Tim Robbins, Chris Penn, Robert Downey Jr., Jack Lemmon, Jennifer Jason Leigh

The day-to-day lives of a number of suburban Los Angeles residents.

I recently read someone describing Paul Thomas Anderson's 'Magnolia' as Short Cuts without all its heart. I kind of see why he described it in such a way because Short Cuts is much more raw whereas Magnolia looks a bit too polished and contrived with characters that we don't relate to as much. I think I have read PT Anderson citing Altman as a big influence on him and like the frog rain in Magnolia there is a similar earth quake sequence in Short Cuts but it doesn't amount to much which is kind of exactly the film going for. The characters in it comes from all social classes and not much stress is given to connecting them to a single big event. You just have to figure out how they are all related and it takes its time to establish that. I think this is so far the earliest film I have seen with the multiple characters multiple storyline angle I have seen, at least in English. Coming from a master director like Robert Altman, it is a masterpiece in this genre.  The themes explored is the whole artificiality of urban life in LA, alienation, meanness of modern society which many people cannot comes to terms with (unrealistic fuckers).

Film is three hours long but doesn't feel like it. My favorite Altman film so far but haven't seen Nashville yet.

Rating: 5/5

Nymphomaniac: Vol. II (2013)

Director: Lars Von Trier
Writer:    Lars Von Trier
Cast:       Charlotte Gainsbourg, Stellan Skarsgard, Willem Dafore, Shia Lebeouf

The continuation of Joe's sexually dictated life delves into darker aspects of her adulthood, obsessions and what led to her being in Seligman's care.

From what I understand these two volume versions of the film were not personally edited by Lars Von Trier from the five and half hours of the footage he had and there will be full single version release of the film in 2014 which could be the director's cut. The second volume is significantly darker and less funny than the previous one with lots of violence involved. It can be very difficult to watch and overall the theme that he is exploring seems to be hypocrisy evident by the conversation the protagonists have regarding democratic societies in which word like negros are frowned upon whereas it essentially contradicts its ideal of people exercising their choice. Many of the same actions like a parent leaving their children for their sex life is done by characters of both genders and the film points out that depending on their gender our reaction towards it differs. This kind hypocrisy is being talked about at the end but in my opinion most of it is a by-product of our evolutionary past and we are predisposed to follow them. Film's last scene brings this fact to the viewers by having the Seligman character, who is portrayed as an asexual intellectual, making sexual advances towards Joe telling her that she has fucked thousands of men and this would make no difference to her.

Volume one is significantly better but this one is also good. Pretty early on in volume two, Charlotte Gainsbourg herself starts portraying her flashback character instead of Stacy Martin which I thought was Lardone in a seamless way. If I were to rank Lars Von Trier's depression trilogy, the order would be Melancholia, Nymphomaniac and then Antichrist at a distant third.

Rating: 3.5/5  

Saturday, August 9, 2014

Airplane! (1980)

Directors: Jim Abrahams, David Zucker, Jerry Zucker
Writers:    Jim Abrahams, David Zucker, Jerry Zucker
Cast:         Robert Hays, Julie Hagerty, Leslie Nielsen

An airplane crew takes ill. Surely the only person capable of landing the plane is an ex-pilot afraid to fly (PTSD). But don't call him Shirley.

This was my second watch of this film and it is a parody on disaster films evident by the opening credits which plays on Jaws. The humor is kind of unique and might not be up everyone's alley but I enjoyed it. It is the kind of humor that one might use to wind people up and for example: 

Rumack: You'd better tell the Captain we've got to land as soon as we can. This woman has to be gotten to a hospital.
Elaine Dickinson: A hospital? What is it?
Rumack: It's a big building with patients, but that's not important right now.

 It references many films and there is one long routine on Saturday Night Fever with an elaborate song and party sequence. Reminded me of 'Hot Fuzz' which also uses overly lone scenes just to make its point. I think for those who grew up with this film might have it as one of their favorite comedy films but those who came later might not enjoy it as much. It is certainly worth a watch and there are plenty of things in the background that one might miss on the first watch. 'Looks like I picked the wrong week to quit sniffing glue'.

Roger Murdock: Flight 2-0-9'er, you are cleared for take-off.
Captain Oveur: Roger!
Tower voice: L.A. departure frequency, 123 point 9'er.
Captain Oveur: Roger!
Victor Basta: Request vector, over.
Tower voice: Flight 2-0-9'er cleared for vector 324.
Roger Murdock: We have clearance, Clarence.
Captain Oveur: Roger, Roger. What's our vector, Victor?
Tower voice: Tower's radio clearance, over!
Captain Oveur: That's Clarence Oveur. Over.
Tower voice: Over.
Captain Oveur: Roger.
Tower voice: Roger, over!

Rating: 3.5/5